Lessons from cryptocurrency exchange’s CEO’s alleged death

08 Feb, 2019 - 00:02 0 Views

eBusiness Weekly

Jeffrey Gogo
If you are a young fortune-hunter toiling away on a computer in a basement, the prospect of death probably isn’t among your top considerations. Equally, if the main draw to crypto is its relative privacy, you may not be particularly eager to share your private keys with your loved ones, as a hacker could sift through your papers, weaponise your keys and empty your savings.

Most privacy-obsessed, wealth-chasing geeks are used to keeping their private keys a total secret. But when the Grim Reaper shows up unannounced, the family of an anonymous crypto-millionaire can be left without access to their relative’s riches. In one of the most widely publicised recent examples, Gerald Cotten, founder and chief executive officer of Canadian cryptocurrency exchange QuadrigaCX, has led to the loss of CAD $190 million (US$145 million) stashed in the platform’s cold storage wallets.

QuadrigaCX this week filed for protection from creditors in the Nova Scotia Supreme Court, claiming to have failed to locate or access the money since the alleged death of Cotten somewhere in India on December 9. The matter was heard on February 5 and the court gave the exchange 30 days to try and locate the money.

However, some interesting detail surrounding Cotten’s death also emerged:  the man filed his will just 12 days before his death. This has led many to speculate that the death is an elaborate exit scam, that Cotten may not be dead at all. In her affidavit, the CEO’s widow, Jennifer Robertson, states that her husband was the sole director and officer at QuadrigaCX and its sister companies at the time of his death.

Significant customer investments are understood to be locked up following the loss of cold storage wallets, especially since QuadrigaCX was the largest crypto exchange in Canada by traded volume.

Cryptocurrency can be lost, particularly if the owner doesn’t share the private keys (a long list of alphanumeric characters) that allow access to the wallet to a third party by way of legacy management. Chainalysis estimates that about 25 percent of all bitcoins now in circulation (valued at roughly $23,5 billion) have already been lost forever, with death accounting for a sizeable portion of the losses.

Now, there are lessons to be learnt here, how that death can affect one’s bitcoin fortune if they didn’t trust anyone with the password to their online wallets. After death, such inheritance can be lost forever.

In 2018, paranoid U.S. investor Matthew Mellon died, leaving few clues to a crypto fortune reportedly valued at more than $500 million.

In South Africa, for instance, thousands of people have invested in cryptocurrencies. However, once they pass away, many of those individuals will die with their holdings.

“As a young industry, with little regulation, it is crucial for investors to become more responsible in their attitude towards cryptocurrency investing,” Eran Brill, an investment management director at Stonehage Fleming in South Africa, told one news site. “Investors need a storage execution strategy for account information, as well as advice on the implications regarding the deceased estate, including access to accounts, distribution to beneficiaries, and tax implications.”

There have already been several examples around the world of bitcoin investors who have died without leaving their keys for their relatives. In such cases, families must deal with a kind of “double funeral”, as they mourn the loss of their loved ones while coming to terms with the loss of an irretrievable fortune that might have been theirs.

This underscores how bitcoin’s main attraction —  it’s safe remove from regulators and impenetrable privacy from regulation — can also become its fatal weakness. Users may enjoy immunity from high bank fees and taxes, but they miss out on the good side of the old system, such as help with the administration of their estates.

But the example of Mellon, in particular, may encourage investors to start thinking beyond their own lives. Mellon died in April last year at the age of 54. He passed away with up to $500 million in ripple stashed away in cold storage under fake names in banks across the US But the secretive millionaire took his fortune with him, because he failed to name heirs to his wealth and did not provide information on how to access his crypto wallets.

Posthumous losses of cryptocurrency will likely become more of a problem in the years to come, as investors will remain inclined to value secrecy to safeguard their wallets. While death is a concern, bitcoin wealth can also be lost through theft, accidental deletion, security breaches, and the loss of passwords and hard drives. This explains, in part, why cryptocurrency investors are secretive about their details.

South Africa’s formal recognition of bitcoin means its laws of succession apply to cryptocurrencies, as with other investments in the estates of deceased individuals. However, it is still up to investors themselves to formally identify their heirs in their wills.

That said, having a will does not automatically mean that one’s bitcoin wealth will get passed down to loved ones. Private keys are still needed to unlock crypto wallets, which is why individuals need to leave clear instructions on how their heirs can access their fortunes.

Inheritable digital safe services such as Digipulse help people to keep their bitcoin information safe, while allowing it to be utilized for legacy purposes. Simpler methods might include entrusting third parties with copies of private keys, either on paper or in digital format, but such options necessitate a level of trust.

Share This:

Sponsored Links